When Black Eyes and Police Reports Don’t Matter

READER POST: When my friend, *Rachel, visited me and showed me a black eye inflicted by her husband, I was concerned for her safety. She told me about the horrific abuse she had suffered for years and said the psychological abuse was worse than the physical abuse. As a Stake Relief Society President at the time, I had recently attended a regional training session where we were taught that the Church did not condone domestic abuse.  I encouraged Rachel to meet with her bishop and felt confident he would help her.

I was wrong.

Rachel’s husband, a former bishop, was well-liked in his stake. Instead of her bishop comforting her, he condemned her. Her bishop told Rachel that she had fabricated the abuse, even after she showed him doctor’s reports of past injuries. He told her she must stay married, remain silent, and tell no one of her abuse.

Eventually, the abuse became life-threatening, and Rachel left. She was shunned by her friends and family members, who believed her husband’s lies. A former football player, her husband convinced their friends and family that Rachel, who weighed less than 100 pounds, had precipitated the fights. He also asserted that Rachel was delusional and her abuse claims were false.

After the divorce was finalized, Rachel lost everything: her home, family, and friends. Her children, whom she adored, sided with her husband and her bishop, and told Rachel she had destroyed her marriage. Her husband, a wealthy, charismatic, powerful man in their community, hid his assets and hired five prominent attorneys.  Rachel was left almost destitute.

In an attempt to help Rachel, my husband and I contacted her stake president, who dismissed us, and then the Area Authority, outlining the physical and mental abuse Rachel had suffered and asking him to review the case. We told him that physicians had detailed reports of her injuries and that they could validate her claims. We hoped that this would at least help Rachel reestablish the relationships she had with her adult children and her grandchildren, whom she adored.

Instead of helping Rachel, we hurt her. She was called in by her bishop and disfellowshipped for not heeding his counsel. My husband and I were called into the office of our stake president by Rachel’s stake president. Her stake president was enraged that we had contacted the Area Authority and told us if we lived in his stake, we would be excommunicated.

Unfortunately, Rachel’s scenario is not uncommon. I have seen it play out over and over again in various forms in the Church. For instance, a close friend was molested by her bishop, who came to her home when she was very ill, knowing that her husband was on a Church assignment. When she and her husband reported the abuse to their stake president, they were threatened with Church sanctions and she was accused of being a liar. Another childhood friend was groomed by her branch president while she was working at his resort. She became pregnant by him and was excommunicated for two years. He was disfellowshipped for nine months. All of these women I have described remain active in the Church, but each carries deep wounds from ecclesiastical abuse.

My son-in-law, a bishop and a respected physician, reports that he treats numerous survivors of abuse, some of whom are married to members of bishoprics and stake presidencies. These women have no ecclesiastical recourse and are victimized further by the Church, a place that should offer healing and comfort to the afflicted and broken.

I encourage abuse victims–whenever possible and safe–to document and report abuse to police, as well as to leave the home for a safe place. However, when women leave an abusive situation, the abuse can escalate. It did for Rachel and even for us. Her brakes were cut, and we received threatening phone calls from her husband. Her other friends found themselves in danger as well when they tried to shelter Rachel.

As a church, we must do a better job to help abused women. These changes will not be fully realized in a patriarchal system. When dealing with abused women, stake and ward Relief Society presidents should have a voice equal voice to that of bishops or stake presidents. Female abuse victims should have the opportunity to meet simultaneously with the bishop and Relief Society president to discuss abuse issues. No abuse survivor, whether the abuse is sexual, psychological, or physical, should be blamed for being abused. Untrained and unqualified ward and stake leaders should not assume the role of a professional therapist in helping a survivor recover from abuse. They may offer spiritual succor, but psychological counseling should be left to professionals.

Abuse in the Church is more systemic and problematic than many realize. Unfortunately, as I understand it, the Church’s legal department has survivors sign non-disclosure agreements when they report abuse by Church and Boy Scout leaders, so the full extent of abuse cannot be determined. However, if even one survivor is dehumanized, marginalized, or defamed by Church leaders, that is one woman too many.

Women should never be forced to suffer in silence.

The shaming and blaming of abuse survivors in the Church must stop.


READER BIO: Karen grew up in Salt Lake City and is the daughter of two lifelong Mormons. She earned a Master’s Degree at BYU, has been an active member throughout her life, and has embraced friends of all races and religions, as her parents before her. She has a kind husband, four  children, thirteen grandchildren, and has volunteered as an educator at the Rape Recovery Center. She is an advocate of Buddhist meditation, which has helped her survive the cognitive dissonance of seeing many women experience ecclesiastical abuse in the LDS Church. She prays for the day when Church leaders will give all survivors of abuse the respect and compassion that they deserve.

NOTE: Guest submissions are received with appreciation and in general good faith. Although reasonable, respectful efforts are made to verify the content, ultimate and exclusive responsibility for published reader submissions rests with its author. Sisters Quorum cannot guarantee the veracity of guest content. Author names may be pseudonyms.

*Names in post have been changed for the purposes of confidentiality.

The Sisters Quorum would appreciate hearing your stories. Feel free to comment on this post or see our Submissions page

Please like and follow Sisters Quorum on Facebook. You can find us by clicking here.


7 Replies to “When Black Eyes and Police Reports Don’t Matter”

  1. I have been married to an abuser for over 30 years until I finally divorced him. I’m sorry to hear of these experiences.
    I have had the opposite experience. Every bishop I ever talked to was very supportive. They all told me they weren’t professional therapists and helped me find one and even helped pay for sessions. They all told me that his behavior was unacceptable, gave me blessings, and some were really good about checking in with me. They also told me that while they can’t recommend divorce, they would completely understand if I chose to leave him and would support me in that decision.
    I’m grateful for the support of these good men and I’m sorry to hear there are some who are completely misguided. I am confident that a great majority of priesthood leaders handle abusive situations in a more professional, loving manner.


    1. Grace, I’m so happy to hear that your priesthood leaders have been supportive in ways you have found appropriate, and I agree that *most interactions between women and their bishops and stake presidents are positive, even in cases where are victims of domestic abuse. At least, I hope that. I am confident the majority of our leaders are sensitive and caring.

      This post by our reader (and others on this site) aren’t meant as accusations that leaders are abusive, but rather to point out that a second level abuse toward women is possible (and too frequent) within the system. Now, I suppose abuse is possible in *any system, but most systems have a way to rectify that abuse. Unfortunately, women have no way to report abuse by local leaders up the ecclesiastical chain of command. If we write letters to area authorities or higher, those letters are returned to the very men who are engaging in ecclesiastical abuse. That needs to change. Not all leaders need to change–most are doing very well–but the system needs to better protect women from the few who fall to the temptation to misuse their power.

      Thanks for commenting! I love to hear positive stories.


  2. This is an excellent blog post. Thank you for sharing it. I have known many women in the Church who have been abused by ecclesiastical leaders and have been silenced. The Church needs a hotline staffed by female therapists where women can call. The Church must adopt a policy that does not protect ecclesiastical leaders who abuse others. Right now their legal department only protects the Church’s corporate interests. Even when the Church decides a leader is guilty of abuse, to receive a financial settlement the abuse victim must sign a non-disclosure agreement so that he or she cannot talk to others about the abuse.


Leave a Reply to Grace Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: